Of a number of points of analysis which suggests that the informationĮventually published by the Guccifer 2.0 persona was not obtained by a 7z file times, after adjustment to East Coast time fall into the Zone, with this conclusion supported by the observation that Guccifer 2.0 were first copied to a system located in the Eastern Time States that the files that eventually published as "NGP-VAN" by Operation.” Carter’s website was described by Wikileaks as a useful source of primary information specifically regarding Guccifer 2.0.Ĭarter recently spoke to Disobedient Media, explaining that he had been contacted by The Forensicator, who had published a document which contained a detailed analysis of the data published by Guccifer 2.0 as "NGP-VAN."
Leadership were very likely to have been behind the Guccifer 2.0 (CrowdStrike executives), working for either the HRC campaign or DNC Present, it looks a LOT like Shawn Henry & Dmitri Alperovitch Carter has stated on his website that “At The group’s President Shawn Henry is a retired executive assistant director of the FBI while their co-founder and CTO, Dmitri Alperovitch, is a senior fellow at the Atlantic Council, which as we have reported, is linked to George Soros. In the unique position of being the only direct source of evidence that a Information ultimately provided by Crowdstrike this places the company However, their evaluation was based solely on Used the information provided by Crowdstrike to claim that Russians Other groups including Threat Connect have Published by Guccifer 2.0, which were previously discussed in depth by Adam Carter.ĭisobedient Media previously reported that Crowdstrike is the only group that has directly analyzed the DNC servers. This article focuses solely on evidence stemming from the files Published by Guccifer 2.0 under the title "NGP-VAN." This should not beĬonfused with the separate publication of the DNC emails by Wikileaks. The Forensicator specifically discusses the data that was eventually If true, this analysis obliterates the Russian hacking narrative completely. Their analysis indicates the data was almost certainly not accessed initially by a remote hacker, much less one in Russia. Supplied to Disobedient Media via Adam Carter was authored by an The groundbreaking new analysis irrevocably destroys the Russian hacking narrative, and calls the actions of Crowdstrike and the DNC into question. The individual most likely used a USB drive to copy the information. Were likely initially downloaded by a person with physical access to a computer possibly connected to the internal DNC network. Suggests that files eventually published by the Guccifer 2.0 persona Today by an independent researcher known as The Forensicator, which Unfortunately, this fake news would be reported as if it were factual.New meta-analysis has emerged from a document published It appears that there were a variety of flaws in their on-going efforts to find a link to the Trump campaign. With CrowdStrike being called out for mishandling the start of the investigation, the story seems to get worse. Officials from the Ukraine also contend that these events were completely false. Not only was the data not credible, but it was also reported by technology experts that the data used was not read correctly. This was not something CrowdStrike gathered on their own it was data that came from a propaganda website. The evidence in the DNC case was based on faulty evidence. This is where the story starts to fall apart, in part because the Ukrainian incident did not happen. The specific type of malware would act like an electronic fingerprint. This link would become the smoking gun that would prove Russia did hack the DNC servers. The reason CrowdStrike was able to tie “Fancy Bear” to Russia was that it was also used to hack into an app used by the Ukrainian Army.
#Dnc server hack proof code#
“Fancy Bear,” which is a code name for the type of malware, was allegedly used by Russian hackers to get to the DNC servers.
0 kommentar(er)
